Project Description
The MD 355 Flash BRT service, identified in the Countywide Transit Corridors Functional Master Plan, will provide upgraded bus service along MD 355 (Wisconsin Avenue/Rockville Pike/Frederick Road), bringing fast and reliable transit service in dedicated lanes, where feasible, to this busy corridor. The project will create new connections and support growth and redevelopment at key activity centers along the corridor including in downtown Bethesda, White Flint, Rockville, and Gaithersburg.
CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR, AND BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES
Project Map
Download the project map to explore proposed roadway, station locations, and bicycle and pedestrian plans. Open with Google Earth.
DOWNLOAD PROJECT MAP

Get Involved
Thank you to those who provided input on the project!
Stay Informed
Sign up to receive project updates and information.
SIGN UP FOR UPDATESProject Updates
Service Plan for Flash BRT Service on MD 355 (Rockville Pike/Frederick Road)
Flash BRT Buses will operate frequently all day, so riders will be able to travel along Maryland 355 quickly without the need to locate and review a bus schedule. Convenient routes will connect major destinations including shopping, schools, workplaces, healthcare, parks, and neighborhoods. Transfers to local Ride On buses, Metrobus, and the Metrorail red line are also possible and will be convenient.
Once the project is fully constructed, MCDOT proposes five routes to serve the corridor on overlapping segments. The column on the left of the visual show how often a Flash bus is proposed to arrive at stops in different locations along the corridor, with the frequencies of Flash bus arrivals ranging from every three to every twelve minutes during rush hour periods, depending on the location.
For the central phase of the Maryland 355 Flash BRT, three routes are proposed to serve the corridor. Flash buses are proposed to arrive at stops between 3 and 8 minutes apart during rush hour, depending on the location.
MCDOT is also currently studying how the rest of the County's bus routes should be organized through an effort called “Ride On Reimagined.” Details on that study can be found at www.montgomerycountymd.gov/DOT-Transit/reimagined.www.montgomerycountymd.gov/DOT-Transit/reimagined.
Station Design
The Flash stations on MD 355 will have a consistent design that provides a high-quality experience for riders and is consistent with other Flash stations in the County. The stations will be accessible for all riders, including those in wheelchairs. Based on the conditions around each station, some stations along MD 355 will be located on the side of the roadway, while others will be in the middle of MD 355, accessible by a safe pedestrian crossing.
Roadway Design and Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements on MD 355
The current roadway design plans for the MD 355 Flash BRT are now available at the links below for your review. These design plans have been developed with the objective of accommodating median-running dedicated Flash lanes where feasible, based on the findings from the last phase of study for this project, recognizing and adjusting where necessary based upon constraints in some locations along the corridor. The following “typical section” images show what the different lane options identified for the corridor may look like. However, the design will be customized in some locations based on constraints.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Options
The MD 355 Flash BRT design team is considering how the project could include new or updated bicycle and pedestrian facilities to ensure people can safely access Flash stations as well as other destinations along the corridor. Roadway characteristics, conditions, and constraints vary considerably depending on the specific location. MCDOT is considering a variety of bicycle and pedestrian facilities along the MD 355 corridor.
Project Status
MCDOT completed the Planning and Conceptual Engineering of the MD 355 BRT in 2019, which concluded with a preference expressed by the County Council Transportation and Environment (T&E) Committee for an alternative that would provide for a mostly median-running BRT between Bethesda and Clarksburg. The project completed Preliminary Engineering in 2022. In this phase, MCDOT has developed detailed design plans, refined the conceptual engineering, identified ways to enhance performance and reduce costs and impacts, and developed detailed cost estimates. Throughout 2023 and 2024, the project is within the Project Implementation phase. MCDOT is refining the design plans and defining construction, contractor, andThis does no business opportunities. Additionally, MCDOT is undergoing required federal and state environmental processes. The MD 355 Project is scheduled to finalize design and start construction by 2025.
Resources
- Virtual Open House (June 2019) (Works best when viewed with Chrome, Safari, or Firefox browsers.)
- Study Documentation
Phase 2 Study Documents (June 2019)
All items linked below are DRAFT documents for Phase 2 of the MD 355 BRT Corridor Study (June 2019)- Executive Summary
- Corridor Summary Report
- Appendix A: Existing Transit Conditions Report
- Appendix B: Alternatives Technical Report
- Alternatives Technical Report Appendix
- Appendix C: Station Screening Report
- Appendix D: Alternatives Mapping
- Appendix E: Traffic and Ridership Forecasting Analysis Summaries
- Appendix F: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Memorandum
- Appendix G: Noise Technical Memorandum
- Appendix H: Community Effects Technical Report
- Appendix I: Cultural Resources Technical Report
- Appendix J: Hazardous Materials Technical Report
- Appendix K: Indirect & Cumulative Effects Technical Report
- Appendix L: Natural Resources Technical Report
- Appendix M: Public Outreach Summary
- Stormwater Management Technical Report
- GIS Mapping
Phase 1 Study Documents (April 2017)
- MD 355 BRT Conceptual Alternatives Report (28MB) (April 2017)
- BRT Presentation (2MB) from Interjurisdictional Meeting on BRT (2MB) (March 2017)
- MD 355 BRT Preliminary Purpose and Need Report (2MB)
- MD 355 Managed Lane Feasibility Study (2MB) (Dec. 18, 2015)
Corridor Advisory Committee
Corridor Advisory Committees were created in 2015 as part of the Montgomery County Department of Transportation's (MCDOT) planning project for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) on the MD 355 corridor from Bethesda to Clarksburg. The committee members are residents, business owners, and other stakeholders along the corridor. CAC meetings allow MCDOT to both give updates on the project to members of the community and to gather feedback from stakeholders along this portion of the corridor.
For more information on this corridor, see the Countywide Transit Corridors Functional Master Plan.
Meeting Documents
CAC Meeting #16 (May 25, 2022)
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Video recording of Design Breakout
- Meeting Summary
CAC Meeting #15 (February 3, 2022)
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting Summary
CAC Meeting #14 (Tuesday, April 20, 2021)
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting Summary
CAC Meeting #13 (Wednesday, June 5th 2019)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting Summary
CAC Meeting #12 (Wednesday, February 21, 2018)
CAC Meeting #11 (Tuesday, October 4, 2017)
- Agenda
- Letter to CAC Members (Sept 2017)
- Project Team Members
- Project Timeline
- Strategic Plan
- Project History Memorandum
- List of Past CAC Meeting Topics
- Draft Public Involvement Plan
- Draft CAC Program Plan
- Draft Goals, Objectives, and Measures of Effectiveness
- MD 355 BRT Alternatives Description
- MD 355 BRT Alternatives Map and Brochure
- Email to CAC Members (9/18/17)
- Email to CAC Members (9/27/17)
- Video recording of meeting
- Map of Alternatives
- Activity Boards
- Presentation
CAC Meeting #10 (Thursday, May 18, 2017)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Summary
CAC Meeting #9 (Wednesday, October 26, 2016)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Video 1 / Video 2 recording of meeting
- Summary
CAC Meeting #8 (Wednesday, October 19, 2016)
CAC Meeting #7 (Tuesday, June 7, 2016)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- BRT alternatives draft
- Service and station map handout draft
- Video recording of meeting
- Summary
*March 3 meeting was postponed to March 16 due to snow.
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting summary
CAC Open House (Tuesday, February 2, 2016)
- FAQ (document that compiled common questions (with answers) occurring in member comments leading up to the open house)
- Draft Preliminary Purpose and Need Document (while this document was not distributed at the meeting due to its length, it was the subject of the meeting, so for the reader’s convenience it is linked here for reference)
CAC Meeting #5 (Thursday, December 10, 2015)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Handout used during breakout session
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting summary
CAC Meeting #4 (optional) (Tuesday, September 1, 2015)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Frequently asked questions
- Video recording of the meeting
- Meeting summary
CAC Meeting #3 (Wednesday, June 3, 2015)
CAC Meeting #2 (Tuesday, April 14, 2015)
- Agenda
- Results from homework exercise
- Presentation
- Maps of existing transit operations (high resolution: 1.3 MB)
- Maps of existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities (high resolution: 1.1 MB)
- Discussion draft of goals and objectives.
- Meeting summary
CAC Meeting #1 (Saturday, February 28, 2015)
- Mission statement and member ground rules
- Agenda (version for February 21st 2015)
- Presentation
- Meeting summary
CAC Meeting #16 (May 25, 2022)
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Video recording of Design Breakout
- Meeting Summary
CAC Meeting #15 (February 3, 2022)
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting Summary
CAC Meeting #14 (Thursday, April 22, 2021)
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting Part 1 and Part 2
- Meeting Summary
CAC Meeting #13 (Tuesday, June 4th 2019)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting Summary
CAC Meeting #12 (Monday, February 12th 2018)
- Agenda
- Pre-meeting Activity
- Activity Appendix
- Video recording of meeting
- Engineering Boards
- Service Planning Boards
- Stations Boards
- Meeting Summary
(The following items make reference to the MD355 South CAC. But they also apply to the MD355 Central CAC given that, until December 7th, 2017, MD355 South CAC used to cover what is today covered by MD355 Central CAC.)
CAC Meeting #11 (Tuesday, October 10th 2017)
- Agenda
- Letter to CAC Members (Sept 2017)
- Project Team Members
- Project Timeline
- Strategic Plan
- Project History Memorandum
- List of Past CAC Meeting Topics
- Draft Public Involvement Plan
- Draft CAC Program Plan
- Draft Goals, Objectives, and Measures of Effectiveness
- MD 355 BRT Alternatives
- MD 355 BRT Alternatives Map and Brochure
- Email to CAC Members (9/18/17)
- Email to CAC Members (9/27/17)
- Video recording of meeting
- Maps of Alternatives
- Activity Boards
- Presentation
CAC Meeting #10 (Tuesday, May 16 th 2017)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting summary
CAC Meeting #9 (Wednesday, November 9 th 2016)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Video 1 / Video 2 recording of meeting
- Meeting summary
CAC Meeting #8 (Tuesday, October 25 th 2016)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Map with BRT alternatives (alternatives 1 and 2 are not shown explicitly)
- Map with proposed service and stations
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting Summary
- Agenda
- Presentation
- BRT alternatives
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting Summary
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting summary
CAC Open House (Tuesday, February 2 nd 2016)
- FAQ (document that compiled common questions (with answers) occurring in member comments leading up to the open house)
- Draft Preliminary Purpose and Need Document (while this document was not distributed at the meeting due to its length, it was the subject of the meeting, so for the reader’s convenience it is linked here for reference)
CAC Meeting #5 (Tuesday, December 15 th 2015)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Handout used during breakout session
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting summary
CAC Meeting #4 (optional) (Monday, August 31 st 2015)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Frequently asked questions
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting summary
CAC Meeting #3 (Thursday, June 4 th 2015)
CAC Meeting #2 (Thursday, April 16 th 2015)
- Agenda
- Results from homework exercise
- Presentation
- Maps of existing transit operations (high resolution: 1.3 MB)
- Maps of existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities (high resolution: 1.1 MB)
- Discussion draft of goals and objectives
- Meeting summary
CAC Meeting #1 (Saturday, February 28 th 2015)
- Mission statement and member ground rules
- Agenda (version for February 21st 2015)
- Presentation (version for February 21st 2015)
- Meeting summary
CAC Meeting #16 (May 25, 2022)
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Video recording of Design Breakout
- Meeting Summary
CAC Meeting #15 (February 3, 2022)
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting Summary
CAC Meeting #14 (Tuesday, April 27, 2021)
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting Summary
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting Summary
CAC Meeting #12 (Tuesday, February 13th, 2018)
CAC Meeting #11 (Tuesday, October 10th, 2017)
- Agenda
- Letter to CAC Members (Sept 2017)
- Project Team Members
- Project Timeline
- Strategic Plan
- Project History Memorandum
- List of Past CAC Meeting Topics
- Draft Public Involvement Plan
- Draft CAC Program Plan
- Draft Goals, Objectives, and Measures of Effectiveness
- MD 355 BRT Alternatives
- MD 355 BRT Alternatives Map and Brochure
- Email to CAC Members (9/18/17)
- Email to CAC Members (9/27/17)
- Video recording of meeting
- Maps of Alternatives
- Activity Boards
- Presentation
CAC Meeting #10 (Tuesday, May 16th 2017)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting summary
CAC Meeting #9 (Wednesday, November 9th 2016)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting summary
CAC Meeting #8 (Tuesday, October 25th 2016)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Map with BRT alternatives (alternatives 1 and 2 are not shown explicitly)
- Map with proposed service and stations
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting Summary
CAC Meeting #7 (Tuesday, June 14th 2016)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- BRT alternatives
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting Summary
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting summary
CAC Open House (Tuesday, February 2nd 2016)
- FAQ (document that compiled common questions (with answers) occurring in member comments leading up to the open house)
- Draft Preliminary Purpose and Need Document (while this document was not distributed at the meeting due to its length, it was the subject of the meeting, so for the reader’s convenience it is linked here for reference)
CAC Meeting #5 (Tuesday, December 15th 2015)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Handout used during breakout session
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting summary
CAC Meeting #4 (optional) (Monday, August 31st 2015)
- Agenda
- Presentation
- Frequently asked questions
- Video recording of meeting
- Meeting summary
CAC Meeting #3 (Thursday, June 4th 2015)
CAC Meeting #2 (Thursday, April 16th 2015)
- Agenda
- Results from homework exercise
- Presentation
- Maps of existing transit operations (high resolution: 1.3 MB)
- Maps of existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities (high resolution: 1.1 MB)
- Discussion draft of goals and objectives.
- Meeting summary
CAC Meeting #1 (Saturday, February 28th 2015)
- Mission statement and member ground rules
- Agenda (version for February 21st 2015)
- Presentation (version for February 21st 2015)
- Meeting summary
Nancy Abeles
Bethesda Crest Homeowners Association (Bethesda)
Joshua Raymond Arcurio
Grosvenor Park Condo Citizens Association (North Bethesda)
Jerry Callistein
College Gardens Civic Association (Rockville)
Gene Cornelius
Pike District (North Bethesda)
Kristi Cruzat
Fallswood Condo Association (North Bethesda)
Cherian Eapen
Interested Resident (Clarksburg)
Roger Fox
Grosvenor Park II Condos (North Bethesda)
Jerry Garson
Montgomery County Civic Federation, Inc. (Countywide)
Peter Henry
Watkin's Mill Town Center (Gaithersburg)
Peter Katz
Interested Resident (Kensington)
Ajay Khetarpal
West End Citizens Association (Rockville)
Richard O. Levine
Locust Hill Citizens Association (Bethesda)
Richard Lindstrom
Interested Resident (Gaithersburg)
James Martin
Interested Resident (Clarksburg)
Andy O'Hare
Temporary Rep, East Bethesda Citizens Association (Bethesda)
Mark Pace
Montgomery College (Rockville, Germantown)
Era Pandya
Interested Resident (Clarksburg)
D. Todd Pearson
Saul Centers, Inc. (Bethesda)
Margaret Schoap
TAME [Transit Alternatives to Mid-County Highway] Coalition (Regional)
David W. Sears
Montgomery County Sierra Club (Countywide)
Peter L. Shaw
Interested Resident (Rockville)
Mike Stein
Rockville Transportation and Mobility Commission (Rockville)
Zachary (Zac) Trupp
Greater Capital Area Association of Realtors (Regional)
Gary Unterberg
Gaithersburg-Germantown Chamber, Rodgers Consulting, Inc. (Gaithersburg, Germantown)
Ronald C. Welke
Greenridge Baptist Church (Clarksburg)
Greg Wimms
Upcounty Citizens Advisory Board (Upcounty)
Joel Yesley
Interested Resident (Gaithersburg)
TBD
Greater Bethesda Chamber of Commerce (Bethesda)
TBD
National Institutes of Health (Bethesda)
TBD
U.S. Naval Support Activity (Bethesda)
FAQS
The MD 355 BRT will provide a new transit service with greater travel speed and frequency along the MD 355 corridor that will help:
- Enhance transit connectivity and integration with other travel modes and transit options.
- Improve bus speed and reliability.
- Address current and future bus ridership demands.
- Attract new riders and provide improved service for existing bus and transit riders.
- Support Master Planned growth and improve transit access to major employment and activity centers.
- Achieve Master Planned non-auto driver modal share.
- Provide a sustainable and cost-effective transit service.
- Improve safety.
Following the adoption of a preferred alternative in early 2022, MCDOT will continue to work, in coordination with key stakeholders, to finalize decisions related to::
- Engineering, including lane widths and other roadway and roadway-adjacent features
- Station locations
- Alignment details
- Service planning (route structure, frequencies, span of service, etc.)
Roadway conditions, capacity, and expansion constraints along MD 355 vary considerably. The proposed alternative includes one or two median-running dedicated BRT lane(s) where feasible. This includes two dedicated, median-running bus lanes between Rockville and North Bethesda, and a single, median-running BRT lane between Gaithersburg and Rockville. The MD 355 BRT is expected to operate in mixed traffic in other areas. However, further engineering and design will determine the locations where dedicated lanes are feasible.
The County does not anticipate large amounts of new parking at most BRT stations along MD 355. However, the County is studying where demand for parking will be highest and how best to accommodate that parking demand to support ridership.
The alternative fuel vehicle industry continues to expand and debut new transit vehicle options. The County already owns and operates standard-length all-electric buses and is exploring other options. MCDOT will continue to monitor developments in the industry and carefully consider the use of sustainable fuel sources for the MD 355 Flash BRT service once the project is closer to implementation.
A detailed cost estimate for the MD 355 BRT is being developed as part of the current phase of the project.
Delivery of the project is highly dependent on numerous factors including Council approval, available funding, approval and permitting processes, and construction speed
MCDOT anticipates that funding for the project will come from a combination of federal, state, and local sources. The County is exploring options for new sources of revenue.
MCDOT understands that the community relies on existing services, and that there is a need to serve areas where BRT cannot be built in the short term with high-quality services. MCDOT and its partners are planning for the MD 355 BRT concurrently with a variety of other projects. These projects will address other transit needs throughout the County with the MD 355 BRT in mind. They include:
- Ride On Reimagined
The Ride On Reimagined Study is a comprehensive, forward-looking assessment of the bus network that will result in significant recommended changes to how transit operates in Montgomery County based on current and future needs, including the need to connect to future BRT corridors like MD 355. - Corridor Forward
The Corridor Forward Plan will produce a prioritized list of transit options and an implementation plan detailing the milestones and resources necessary for Montgomery County to provide transit to residents and workers in the I-270 corridor. Operating parallel to I-270, the MD 355 BRT will play an important role in supporting transit connections of residents and workers between destinations along the eastern side of I-270. The MD 355 BRT will be a critical link in the integrated network of transit services this study will identify to serve the I-270 corridor. - I-270 Managed Lanes
The I-270 Managed Lanes Study is evaluating alternatives that address the needs to accommodate existing and long-term traffic growth along the corridor, enhance trip reliability, expand travel options, accommodate homeland security, and improve the movement of goods and services. The MD 355 BRT’s ability to serve mobility needs adjacent to and along I-270 (the County’s busiest north-south corridor) will play an important role in addressing long-term growth and associated needs identified through this study in this part of the County. - Other BRT Projects and Studies
- New Hampshire Avenue BRT
- North Bethesda BRT
- Veirs Mill Road (MD 586) BRT
Since 2015, MCDOT has held regular meetings regarding the MD 355 BRT project with key stakeholder organizations including the Cities of Gaithersburg and Rockville, the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, the Maryland Department of Transportation, local Corridor Advisory Committees, and a variety of community-based organizations. MCDOT has also held multiple series of public open houses and dozens of pop-up events each year since 2015. MCDOT has reviewed and considered hundreds of public comments and survey responses regarding the MD 355 BRT.
There are several ways you can get involved! For more information, see our Get Involved page.
Funding
The full project is funded through final design. Construction funding has been recommended for the segment of the project between Montgomery College – Rockville and Montgomery College – Germantown. For more information, see Central Phase and South/North Phases.
Project Contact Information
Executive Director:
Zouli Bereddad
Division of Transportation Engineering
Transportation Planning and Design